Human-guided AI · Reverse-engineered 3D

From mixed evidence.
To a verified 3D asset.

A disciplined reconstruction workflow turned product photos, assembly drawings, and human corrections into explicit geometry, transparent QA, a frozen GLB, and an interactive browser delivery.

Independent visual reconstruction. Public depiction and model-distribution rights are approved; source references remain unpublished.

Final perspective render of the Fujiwara Tofu Shop visual reconstruction
VISUAL ASSET V1.0Human-approved composition · verified delivery
5.90 mapproved building width
216verified meshes
10material slots
100 / 100freeze hashes verified

01 · Human-in-the-loop method

The model improved because evidence and judgment stayed separate.

The human defined what must look right and corrected ambiguous visual readings. The AI translated those decisions into task constraints, scene-spec fields, procedural geometry, repeatable cameras, and validation reports. Neither role was treated as optional.

01

Collect evidence

Separate product views, assembly diagrams, instruction pages, and low-confidence unseen regions.

02

Write the contract

Store dimensions, units, sources, confidence, and assumptions in a parseable scene specification.

03

Build and align

Generate the blockout, compare orthographic views, mark offsets, then make bounded geometry corrections.

04

Freeze decisions

Snapshot approved geometry and later visual assets with reports, SHA-256 hashes, and read-only archives.

05

Validate delivery

Round-trip the GLB, verify UV and material structure, run browser QA, and state limitations instead of hiding them.

02 · Alignment before detail

Orthographic evidence made disagreements visible before the model changed.

Front and driveway-side passes used fixed cameras and visual review notes to separate position, size, curvature, and opening-layout errors. The most important failure was semantic: the roof billboard and curved storefront awning were initially confused. Human clarification corrected the category before more geometry was built.

Final front orthographic QA render
Front orthographic QA
Final driveway-side orthographic QA render
Driveway-side orthographic QA
Final six-view quality assurance contact sheet
Six-view visual contact sheet

03 · Freeze as a production primitive

Approval became a file set, not a memory.

The final milestone records the approved GLB, scene-spec version, six QA views, material inventory, pipeline report, rights boundary, limitations, and hashes. This creates a stable base for future work and makes silent regressions detectable.

ASSETVisual Asset v1.0
VALIDATIONGLB round-trip · 0 invalid transforms
UV216 / 216 meshes valid
BOUNDARYPrivate evidence excluded from public case

04 · Material architecture

Recognition details were organized without turning the asset into a texture dump.

Ten explicit slots keep walls, roof, brick, metal, glass, ground, signage, props, trunk, and foliage independently editable. UV checks and a separate signage region preserve direction and future revision safety.

Color-coded material slot review
Ten-slot material grouping review
UV layout overview for the reconstruction
UV layout and atlas planning evidence

05 · Interactive delivery

Inspect the frozen public model in real time.

Drag to orbit and switch between the same perspective and orthographic camera families used for QA. The public GLB keeps the approved geometry, UVs, materials, and textures while removing private source metadata.

06 · Technical evidence

Visual approval and technical validation were recorded as different gates.

The asset passed production build, browser QA, GLB round-trip, material and UV checks, duplicate-name checks, transform checks, bounds checks, and final freeze verification. Product fidelity remains a human visual decision.

Technical milestone: passed · Public depiction and model distribution: approved

Six rendered QA views of the final reconstruction
Front, driveway, opposite, back, top, and perspective views.

07 · Limitations and rights

A transparent visual reconstruction is still not an official or survey-grade asset.

Conservative rear facade

Rear evidence was limited, so the final facade intentionally remains a lower-confidence conservative reconstruction.

Visual milestone scope

No interior, animation, LOD, collider, emissive, normal-map, grime, or manufacturing-precision pass is included.

Public depiction rights

Public depiction and distribution of the reconstructed model are approved. Product photos and instruction materials remain source evidence and are not republished.

Independent reconstruction

The approved public model remains an independently produced reconstruction and is not presented as an official manufacturer asset.

Workflow result

AI accelerated construction. Human review made the asset trustworthy.

The complete source, reports, reference evidence, and immutable freeze remain in a private repository. This public case shares the process, generated QA evidence, limitations, and the downloadable approved model with workstation metadata removed.

Back to top ↑